Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-19 13:15:30
on 18.08.2009 at 20:28
joel wrote :
>> it seems reasonable
>> but it can be implemented through non-member function and still be
>> even more readable acually
>> set(m, list(x, y), val);
>> or even
>> set(m, list(x, y)) = val
> how can this be more readable than m(x,y) = val ???
set(m)(x, y) = val;//? no?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk