Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: joel (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-19 13:20:00
> on 18.08.2009 at 20:28
> joel wrote :
>>> it seems reasonable
>>> but it can be implemented through non-member function and still be
>>> even more readable acually
>>> set(m, list(x, y), val);
>>> or even
>>> set(m, list(x, y)) = val
>> how can this be more readable than m(x,y) = val ???
> set(m)(x, y) = val;//? no?
set is superfluous i think
-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk