Re: [boost] different matrix library?

Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-19 14:06:00

on 19.08.2009 at 21:20
 joel wrote :
>>     set(m)(x, y) = val;//? no?
> set is superfluous i think
yeah but if we continue in same manner we'll end up with overweghted
fat disgusting something

and contrary anyone can define a way (to his taste) to fill an entity
using complete but compact public interface (here i mean only members)

if a funtion can be implemented as nonmember it must be
fewer member functions a class have, more incapsulated the data is

-- 
Pavel