Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-20 11:29:26
on 20.08.2009 at 17:15
Edward Grace wrote :
> Seriously though, I get the feeling that if one's too clever it will
> become impossible for the user to know what they are actually doing -
> therefore a simple expression that would normally be carried out by a
> single BLAS / LAPACK style library call could end up being de-
> optimally represented by a set of other calls.
yeah, it might be an issue but that depends on the quality of specific
in this case actual user can only hope...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk