Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-20 11:20:18

Next message: DE: "Re: [boost] different matrix library?"
Previous message: Mostafa: "Re: [boost] [UUID] uuid.hpp ODR violation and Ctrl-M pollution"
In reply to: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o"
Next in thread: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o"
Reply: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o"

on 20.08.2009 at 3:42
Steven Ross wrote :
> Is there any reason why one approach (unnamed enum for each value vs. single
> unnamed enum for all) is better than the other?
actually no
but i think keepeng values in one enum is more convenient

-- 
Pavel

Next message: DE: "Re: [boost] different matrix library?"
Previous message: Mostafa: "Re: [boost] [UUID] uuid.hpp ODR violation and Ctrl-M pollution"
In reply to: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o"
Next in thread: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o"
Reply: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk