Subject: Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o
From: Steven Ross (spreadsort_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-20 15:20:58
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:20 AM, DE <satan66613_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> on 20.08.2009 at 3:42
> Steven Ross wrote :
> > Is there any reason why one approach (unnamed enum for each value vs.
> > unnamed enum for all) is better than the other?
> actually no
> but i think keepeng values in one enum is more convenient
Thanks for the confirmation (and the suggestions). I'll just leave them as
individual enums then.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk