Subject: Re: [boost] [1.40.0] Release candidates available
From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-26 13:43:27
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>>> Presumably simply using:
>>> bjam -sHAVE_ICU=1
>>> ie *without* setting ICU_PATH should just do the right thing without the
>>> ICU_PATH is there for situations where the ICU library is not already in
>>> the compiler's search paths (ie on Windows), and that shouldn't be the
>>> case on Linux.
>>> HTH John.
>> Yes, looks like -sHAVE_ICU=1 works (is this documented?)
> It's easy to check in the official docs:
> - Volodya
I must respectfully disagree. It's not easy at all. A new user would
probably start with:
>From there quickly jump to:
while skimming through, trying not to become frustrated with the bewildering
wealth of information there, thinking "what is the damn command that is
equivalent to just make?", I don't think he would ever know to look at
It certainly didn't occur to me.