Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review of Boost.Polygon is halfway through and no actual reviews so far
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-29 04:49:56
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> Fernando Cacciola
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 6:27 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Formal Review of Boost.Polygon is halfway through and no
> so far
> The formal review of the Boost.Polygon is halfway through and, while there was
> some useful discussion, there are still no "actual" reviews (where you clearly
> vote for inclusion and rejection).
A trivial question - is there a reason why the copyright is *only* with Intel.
I would have expected the authors to *also* claim copyright.
Is this deliberate?
(This would also make clear who the authors are - for each and every file).
PS For what nano-amount it is worth, you can could my previous reply as a YES,
especially in view of the amount of real-life use reported by Lucanus.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk