Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.Polygon starts today August 24, 2009
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-30 00:10:42
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Steven Watanabe<watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Simonson, Lucanus J wrote:
>> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>> I ran the test with most of the compilers I have available.
>>> I'm getting a lot of compiler warnings from msvc-9.0express,
>>> msvc-8.0express, and gcc-3.4.4.
>>> gcc-4.2.3, gcc-4.3.0, and gcc-mingw-4.4.1 are fine.
>> I'm aware of the warnings in MSVC. How important is it to fix these
> Well, msvc is pretty widely used. I wouldn't say that you
> have to fix them, but I would strongly encourage it.
> gcc 3.4 is sufficiently old, that I wouldn't worry about it much.
>> What is boost policy and precident?
> Boost has no official policy. Some libraries are warning-free.
> Others are fairly noisy, although the older libraries are slowly
> getting cleaned up as users complain.
For note, all the libraries that I use in Boost (only about 15 to 20
or so) are warningless, so there is huge precedent.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk