Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.Polygon starts today August 24, 2009
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-30 00:08:33
Simonson, Lucanus J wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> I ran the test with most of the compilers I have available.
>> I'm getting a lot of compiler warnings from msvc-9.0express,
>> msvc-8.0express, and gcc-3.4.4.
>> gcc-4.2.3, gcc-4.3.0, and gcc-mingw-4.4.1 are fine.
> I'm aware of the warnings in MSVC. How important is it to fix these warnings?
Well, msvc is pretty widely used. I wouldn't say that you
have to fix them, but I would strongly encourage it.
gcc 3.4 is sufficiently old, that I wouldn't worry about it much.
> What is boost policy and precident?
Boost has no official policy. Some libraries are warning-free.
Others are fairly noisy, although the older libraries are slowly
getting cleaned up as users complain.
> I am well aware that I will catch no end of grief from users if they get a slew of warnings. I have no internal MSVC users, but I've spent days chasing warnings for EDG and gcc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk