Subject: Re: [boost] [filesystem] Compatibility with STLPort
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-30 16:30:48
Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]
>> I've created ticket #3241 some time ago, with a patch attached. It's about
>> Boost.Filesystem compatibility with STLPort expression templates feature.
>> So far no activity has appeared on it, although the fix is trivial. Is it
>> OK if I go ahead and commit the patch?
>> PS: Ticket URL is https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3241
> Unless I'm missing something, the code being replaced would be perfectly
> valid with a conforming implementation of the standard library, and only
> causes a problem because STLPort isn't conforming. Thus I'd rather use an
> #ifdef so that the replacement only applies to STLPort.
But the new code is also conforming. Is it worth to put an #ifdef when
the new code alone works everywhere?
> Is this something STLPort intends to fix, by the way?
I didn't ask, as I don't think this can be fixed in STLPort. Unless, by
disabling the template expressions altogether, that is, which is already
possible. But it would be a pity to lose this optimization because of
one or two places of incompatibility that are so easy to fix.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk