Subject: Re: [boost] optional<optional<T>>
From: Joseph Gauterin (joseph.gauterin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-03 09:32:15
I'd avoid special rules; optional<T> should be optional<T> regardless
of what T actually is - and some people have presented actual use
cases where optional< optional<T> > is being used that would be
broken by a reduction to optional<T>.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk