Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] Failures for GCC 4.4.1 with gnu++0x
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-03 11:27:02


Thanks to Noel Belcourt, the trunk Sandia-gcc tests show results
side-by-side for gcc 4.4.1 without and with C++0x features enabled.

See http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/summary.html

Several Boost libraries are passing without 4.4.1 C++0x features but
failing with them:

http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/assign.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/config.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/dynamic_bitset.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/functional-forward.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/fusion.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/interprocess.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/intrusive.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/mpl.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/parameter.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/rational.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/spirit.html
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/xpressive.html

It might be helpful if Boosters take a look at these failures, and
report their conclusions. If the problem is a bug in gcc, please
indicate if the bug has been reported to the gcc folks.

Thanks,

--Beman


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk