Re: [boost] [Boost.Breakable] Any interest in a Boost Breakable library?

Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.Breakable] Any interest in a Boost Breakable library?
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-06 14:04:04

Pierre Morcello wrote:
> Indeed, the macro as I use it right now is even less optimised than a
> GOTO or a do...while(false) : it's currently just a simple 'for' loop in a macro..

I thought you were talking about a set of macros??? Apart from that, I like the idea. However, the idea is sufficient for me, I can just declare the macro myself, so no need for a library.

Regards,
Thomas