Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.Breakable] Any interest in a Boost Breakable library?
From: Pierre Morcello (pmorcell-cppfrance_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-06 14:46:42
>>>>>I thought you were talking about a set of macros???
It is a set of macro because there is also a 'breakable if' and also 'breakable else'.
>>>>However, the idea is sufficient for me, I can just declare the macro myself
Yes, I can understand that : I used to do the same than boost::non_copiable.. But I don't want to keep good ideas for myself.
There is clearly no technical difficulties here. It's more declaring : "there is an interesting way of programming some tedius tasks that use if/else/ do while contructs everywhere".
--- En date de : Dim 6.9.09, Thomas Klimpel <Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden]> a écrit :
De: Thomas Klimpel <Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden]>
Objet: Re: [boost] [Boost.Breakable] Any interest in a Boost Breakable library?
À: "boost_at_[hidden]" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Date: Dimanche 6 Septembre 2009, 11h04
Pierre Morcello wrote:
> Indeed, the macro as I use it right now is even less optimised than a
> GOTO or a do...while(false) : it's currently just a simple 'for' loop in a macro..
I thought you were talking about a set of macros??? Apart from that, I like the idea. However, the idea is sufficient for me, I can just declare the macro myself, so no need for a library.
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk