Subject: Re: [boost] Are warnings acceptable artifacts from builds?
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-11 16:35:42
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> Sure, the question is who is to decide whether a particular warning
> should be disabled. I doubt that any library developer tolerates
> warnings in their code, except for the ones they've decided should be
Unfortunately, many developers tolerate warnings.
> disabled. However, the case of matching opinions isn't interesting,
> this discussion is about how to handle situations when the library
> developer thinks a particular warning should be disabled (or not
> enabled) and someone else thinks otherwise.
When did that become the discussion? I obviously missed the transition.
> Obviously, if someone
> reports a warning and a library developer thinks there is a good way
> to fix the warning, it'll be fixed and that will be the end of it. The
This is a far cry from your earlier claim that someone complaining about a warning was being rude to you, the library developer. Nevertheless, I'm glad to see we've reached consensus.
> interesting case, again, is when there is no "good" way, for some
> definition of "good".
> It really is a problem of standardization. You don't see people
> arguing about whether a compile error should be fixed, such matter is
> resolved by fixes, workarounds and bug reports because there's
> agreed-upon authority (the ANSI standard) which is presumed correct.
> But warnings are issued in cases when the ANSI standard prohibits
> issuing an error, and this makes it difficult to craft a general
> policy that would be reasonable for everyone.
Exactly. Boost can determine a warning configuration for each supported compiler and can mandate the elimination of all warnings, with some possible exceptions that have no good solution. Whether agreement is possible to establish such a position is quite a leap from here, I'd guess.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk