Subject: Re: [boost] Are warnings acceptable artifacts from builds?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-11 17:09:58
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> Obviously, if someone
>> reports a warning and a library developer thinks there is a good way
>> to fix the warning, it'll be fixed and that will be the end of it. The
> This is a far cry from your earlier claim that someone complaining about a warning was being rude to you, the library developer. Nevertheless, I'm glad to see we've reached consensus.
Complaining is fine, it's a free country. :)
What I meant is that often, when reporting a warning, people presume
that it would be unreasonable not to fix the warning, which I think is
inappropriate in the sense that they don't recognize that their ask
may be entirely based on a personal preference others might find
unreasonable. Perhaps "rude" isn't the right word to describe this,
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk