Subject: Re: [boost] Are warnings acceptable artifacts from builds?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-11 19:28:30
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
>>> It isn't quite as fine-grained as msvc's mechanism, but you can use
>>> #pragma GCC system_header
>>> It seems to handle templates okay in recent versions.
>> I was wondering if the GCC pragma works well. If it really does, why
>> not just add it in boost/config and be done with it. :)
> As I understand it, the pragma operates only on the header it's in,
> so I don't see how it can easily be factored out.
Oh right, what a lame suggestion I made :)
Well umm I'm not sure it's helpful at all then. It would be nice to be
able to pass to the compiler a list of paths it should consider
"3rd-party" and not warn unless the warning depends on user
constructs, which I guess fits your statement that it handles
templates okay. But maybe that's problematic for the same reasons
pragma once is.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk