Subject: Re: [boost] Are warnings acceptable artifacts from builds?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-11 19:40:05
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> Well umm I'm not sure it's helpful at all then. It would be nice to be
> able to pass to the compiler a list of paths it should consider
> "3rd-party" and not warn unless the warning depends on user
> constructs, which I guess fits your statement that it handles
> templates okay. But maybe that's problematic for the same reasons
> pragma once is.
You can use -isystem instead of -I.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk