Re: [boost] Are warnings acceptable artifacts from builds?

Subject: Re: [boost] Are warnings acceptable artifacts from builds?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-11 19:46:00

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> AMDG
>
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>>
>> Well umm I'm not sure it's helpful at all then. It would be nice to be
>> able to pass to the compiler a list of paths it should consider
>> "3rd-party" and not warn unless the warning depends on user
>> constructs, which I guess fits your statement that it handles
>> templates okay. But maybe that's problematic for the same reasons
>> pragma once is.
>>
>
> You can use -isystem instead of -I.

Could someone test this with Boost, that is, could someone confirm
that using this approach gets rid of (only) the unwanted warnings?

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode