Subject: Re: [boost] Are warnings acceptable artifacts from builds?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-11 19:46:00
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> Well umm I'm not sure it's helpful at all then. It would be nice to be
>> able to pass to the compiler a list of paths it should consider
>> "3rd-party" and not warn unless the warning depends on user
>> constructs, which I guess fits your statement that it handles
>> templates okay. But maybe that's problematic for the same reasons
>> pragma once is.
> You can use -isystem instead of -I.
Could someone test this with Boost, that is, could someone confirm
that using this approach gets rid of (only) the unwanted warnings?
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk