Subject: Re: [boost] [pool] Thread specific pool allocator
From: James Bremner (ravenspoint_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-14 12:47:00
"Edouard A." <edouard_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Have you tried plugging the HOARD memory allocator into your program?
Yes. This provided a significant performance improvement, however it has
some serious drawbacks
a.. I experienced some crashes during testing
b.. Commercial licensing is expensive
c.. It 'hooks' system calls to malloc, a technique I consider dodgy.
d.. It is a DLL, which I avoid since they result in endless configuration
> Multicore aware programming is more than a simple issue, and certainly not
> solved just by an efficient allocator (although this doesn't hurt ;) ).
Gosh! Did I suggest anything like this? However, a well designed
multithreaded program will slow down, rather than speed up, on a
multi-processor machine when the standard memory allocator is used which
took me, at least, completely by surprise and mystified me for several days.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk