Subject: Re: [boost] [rdb] Uploaded 0.0.07
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-24 17:36:09
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jean-Louis Leroy <jl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Alp Mestan wrote:
>> Since you're using ODBC, theoretically you can just bind your library to
>> RDBMS supporting ODBC ?
> Indeed. That's why I used it as the first backend to support, but with time
> I hope that we'll have native support for all major vendors, for speed and
> for supporting specific features (e.g. table or row locking).
>From my experience, many ODBC wrapper around DB's tend to have speed
hits, as well as not properly optimizing calls for the underlying DB?
I still say a Boost.RDB should be modeled after Python's SQLAlchemy
library, such a wonderful design after using it for a year, and it
optimizes your SQL for the underlying DB (so some may use joins, some
may use other things, etc... whatever is best for the DB).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk