Subject: Re: [boost] [rdb] Uploaded 0.0.07
From: Alp Mestan (alp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-24 18:16:39
Such a thing can be targetted only once rdb will be able to build and query
on a large set of the SQL norm in an easy to use DSEL. Before that, no
expert of RDBMS would be willing to help on such tasks, since I don't think
pure Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc experts are also C++ experts and Boost
Developers at the same time (correct me if I'm wrong, though).
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:36 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jean-Louis Leroy <jl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Alp Mestan wrote:
> >> Since you're using ODBC, theoretically you can just bind your library to
> >> any
> >> RDBMS supporting ODBC ?
> > Indeed. That's why I used it as the first backend to support, but with
> > I hope that we'll have native support for all major vendors, for speed
> > for supporting specific features (e.g. table or row locking).
> >From my experience, many ODBC wrapper around DB's tend to have speed
> hits, as well as not properly optimizing calls for the underlying DB?
> I still say a Boost.RDB should be modeled after Python's SQLAlchemy
> library, such a wonderful design after using it for a year, and it
> optimizes your SQL for the underlying DB (so some may use joins, some
> may use other things, etc... whatever is best for the DB).
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
-- Alp Mestan http://blog.mestan.fr/ http://alp.developpez.com/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk