Re: [boost] [function] "paranoia" vs efficiency

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] "paranoia" vs efficiency
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-02 12:46:52

"Andrey Semashev" <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:4AC62580.9050801_at_gmail.com...
> I think this branching can be effectively elided without sacrificing safety 
> if boost::function maintains never-empty internal guarantee. IOW, if 
> function::empty() returns true, then the function object is actually pointing 
> to some private function that simply throws upon being invoked.

:)
hello noosphere ;-)

-- 
 "That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most
important of all the lessons of history."
 Aldous Huxley