Subject: Re: [boost] Name of namespace detail
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-13 15:32:43
Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
>> Speaking of Boost, the "detail" namespace is commonly used for
>> implementation details, same as "aux" (or variations thereof), so
>> this is a good choice if you're writing a new library for Boost.
> I may stick to the tradition (actually I'm doing that for now) but if
> we always limited ourselves to common usage, Boost would not exist to
> start with would it ? ;-)
Sure, but there's not much point to innovating for irrelevant details.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk