Subject: Re: [boost] Name of namespace detail
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-13 15:33:06
Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
>> Speaking of Boost, the "detail" namespace is commonly used for
>> implementation details, same as "aux" (or variations thereof), so this
>> is a good choice if you're writing a new library for Boost.
> I may stick to the tradition (actually I'm doing that for now) but if we
> always limited ourselves to common usage, Boost would not exist to start
> with would it ? ;-)
You don't mean that every library should reinvent the wheel, do you?
There's nothing bad in following the common practice, it doesn't mean
you're not moving forward.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk