Subject: Re: [boost] The C++ Post-Processor
From: Christopher Jefferson (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-18 12:22:18
On 18 Oct 2009, at 16:54, Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> I agree with everything except Sebastians notion the preprocessor
> was not
> Turing complete, because it is (this has been shown in the past).
> But that's
> just a minor detail.
Are you sure? I'm sure it's not. Template instansiation certainly is,
but I'm sure the preprocessor isn't, due to the lack of recursion or
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk