Subject: Re: [boost] [random] seeding with arbitrary integers
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-23 05:08:27
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> Robert Ramey
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 7:47 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [random] seeding with arbitrary integers
> > Robert Ramey wrote:
> >> Also, I found the documentation not good enough in general. I did
> >> make it work but it wasn't as easy to use as I would have hoped.
> >> Of course I could make the same criticism for many or most libraries.
I agree strongly with this - mentioning no names to protect the guilty ;-)
Thin documentation is still major barrier to use of many Boost libraries.
We all need to do better - and reviewers need to consider documentation more
when considering libraries.
But there is still a chicken and egg problem. Few people are going to write
good documentation for other people until they are confident that they will have
So I repeat my view that we need a two stage acceptance process.
First that the library is fundamentally acceptable, and second that cosmetic
aspects and documentation are good enough.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk