Subject: Re: [boost] [random] seeding with arbitrary integers
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-23 10:45:59
Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
> So I repeat my view that we need a two stage acceptance process.
> First that the library is fundamentally acceptable, and second that
> cosmetic aspects and documentation are good enough.
I don't see this a real change. A tiny incremental change
in the review process can address this.
This almost always conditional on some more work being done.
At this point the author can check into the trunk etc.
c) library is merged into release branch ONLY when
the original review manager certifies that it's done.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk