Re: [boost] Boost policy for putting headers in boost/ Was: #3541 Support <boost/ptr_map.hpp>

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost policy for putting headers in boost/ Was: #3541 Support <boost/ptr_map.hpp>
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-23 12:14:43

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 23 October 2009, Scott McMurray wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess_at_[hidden]>:
> > How do these objections to boost/D/all.hpp not also apply when it is
> > called boost/D.hpp?
>
> Presumably the argument is that if "all" doesn't include every single
> header in the library, then it's misleading, whereas D.hpp can be the
> "author's cut" of functionality.

If you go back and reread the posts I was replying to (or the quote in my 
post), you'll see exactly what D.hpp was laid out to be:

"File D.hpp is either standalone (if no directory D exists) or includes all 
files in subdirectory D."

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrh1nMACgkQ5vihyNWuA4Va8QCggfztmH4wn0MlVeGkF0aScVmx
ua0An1Mqr/KNWbmaaR6dur5DWTWnT35s
=iYNK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----