Subject: Re: [boost] Boost policy for putting headers in boost/ Was: #3541 Support <boost/ptr_map.hpp>
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-23 12:14:43
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Friday 23 October 2009, Scott McMurray wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess_at_[hidden]>:
> > How do these objections to boost/D/all.hpp not also apply when it is
> > called boost/D.hpp?
> Presumably the argument is that if "all" doesn't include every single
> header in the library, then it's misleading, whereas D.hpp can be the
> "author's cut" of functionality.
If you go back and reread the posts I was replying to (or the quote in my
post), you'll see exactly what D.hpp was laid out to be:
"File D.hpp is either standalone (if no directory D exists) or includes all
files in subdirectory D."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk