Re: [boost] Boost policy for putting headers in boost/ Was: #3541 Support <boost/ptr_map.hpp>

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost policy for putting headers in boost/ Was: #3541 Support <boost/ptr_map.hpp>
From: Michael Caisse (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-26 14:27:03

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Fri Oct 23 2009, Eric Niebler <eric-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Yes. That's the case for proto.hpp. It includes everything except
>> debug utilities and typeof registrations. If I were to add
>> serialization or python support, that would also be left out. A
>> proto/all.hpp would either be inefficient and largely useless or else
>> misleading. I imagine the same is true for most libraries.
>>     
>
> It's not true for any of my libraries.  I think boost/D/all.hpp is a
>   

I don't think it is true for proto.hpp either. I'm working on
an embedded port and ran into the boost/proto/debug.hpp include
just this past weekend.

Eric, am I looking at the wrong thing? (boost_1_40_0 release)

michael

-- 
----------------------------------
Michael Caisse
Object Modeling Designs
www.objectmodelingdesigns.com