Subject: Re: [boost] loglite - A logging library
From: Ruediger Berlich (ruediger.berlich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-28 12:51:16
> Please have a look and let me know what you think could be improved.
the SF page currently lists loglite as being covered by the LGPL, while some
source files I looked at are under the Boost license. Is all of loglite
under the Boost license ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk