Subject: Re: [boost] loglite - A logging library
From: JD (jean.daniel.michaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-28 15:17:08
On Oct 28, 5:51 pm, Ruediger Berlich <ruediger.berl..._at_[hidden]>
> JD wrote:
> > Please have a look and let me know what you think could be improved.
> the SF page currently lists loglite as being covered by the LGPL, while some
> source files I looked at are under the Boost license. Is all of loglite
> under the Boost license ?
I haven't spend much time thinking about this but the story is, I
wrote the library initially for boost and chose the boost license.
When I checked in the code on googecode, the boost license was not
available in the list.
I wonder which one is more permissive.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk