Re: [boost] loglite - A logging library

Subject: Re: [boost] loglite - A logging library
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-28 16:51:56

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:14 PM, JD <jean.daniel.michaud_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >  It's been a while since a discussion about logging hasn't ran on the
>> > boost mailing list.
>> >  I have a small logging library implementing some of the requirements
>> > that were previously deemed desirable during the discussion we had here
>> > a couple of years ago.

What is the rationale for attaching semantics to messages (log,
warning, error, etc.)? I'm assuming the logging library isn't going to
take action -- such as terminate the program in case of a fatal error
-- so why not just define severity level?

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode