Subject: Re: [boost] Introduction of numeric_adaptor
From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-02 18:32:29
> This looks like a good idea, but how does it compare to the thin wrappers
> for NTL and mpfr/gmp in boost/math/bindings ? Unfortunately for many
> applications, we really need a complete std libm implementation: the
> Boost.Math binding get close to that, how about these?
Yep I remember now that you had talked about that already last time we
mentioned our work, I completely forgot to look at Boost.Math bindings
since then. However I don't find any real documentation about what it
is exactly (rationale + use case(s)). If the purpose is the same as
our work, there would be no problem to migrate our work into your (add
CLN for instance).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk