Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-04 13:08:59
> That won't work well for a test-runner will it? On the first warning, the
> build will fail. It would be better to have a report of all warnings that
> must be addressed.
The issue is that the warnings are otherwise too easy to ignore. I fear
that unless they are made into errors for some test runners - and those
runners are part of the "required" set - then nothing will get done :-(
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk