Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?

Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-06 23:49:13

on Wed Nov 04 2009, "John Maddock" <john-AT-johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote:

>> That won't work well for a test-runner will it?  On the first warning, the build
>> will fail.  It would be better to have a report of all warnings that must be
>> addressed.
>
> The issue is that the warnings are otherwise too easy to ignore.  I fear that unless
> they are made into errors for some test runners - and those runners are part of the
> "required" set - then nothing will get done :-(

Agreed.

-- 
Dave Abrahams           Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com