Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-06 23:49:13

on Wed Nov 04 2009, "John Maddock" <> wrote:

>> That won't work well for a test-runner will it? On the first warning, the build
>> will fail. It would be better to have a report of all warnings that must be
>> addressed.
> The issue is that the warnings are otherwise too easy to ignore. I fear that unless
> they are made into errors for some test runners - and those runners are part of the
> "required" set - then nothing will get done :-(


Dave Abrahams           Meet me at BoostCon:
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at