Re: [boost] New boost packaging suggestion for windows

Subject: Re: [boost] New boost packaging suggestion for windows
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-05 00:06:09

AMDG

troy d. straszheim wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:08 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>>> I'm hoping Troy can give us a public report on the modularization 
>>> effort.  Troy?
>
> I suppose a picture is worth a thousand words:
>
>   http://sodium.resophonic.com/boost/boost-dependencies.jpg
>
> Please stop reading now and look at that.  Look for cycles and
> dependencies that don't seem to make sense.

I actually don't see /very/ much there that doesn't make sense.
I really don't see what the problem is.  Maybe some refactoring
is in order, but I think that major refactoring is probably a waste
of time.

> Realize that if you took the dependencies of test binaries into 
> account you'd just add more edges.  I don't know how many more.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe