Subject: Re: [boost] New boost packaging suggestion for windows
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-05 09:29:38
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:08 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>>>> I'm hoping Troy can give us a public report on the modularization
>>>> effort. Troy?
>> I suppose a picture is worth a thousand words:
>> Please stop reading now and look at that. Look for cycles and
>> dependencies that don't seem to make sense.
> I actually don't see /very/ much there that doesn't make sense.
I do. Why does spirit depend on xpressive? Why does xpressive depend on
intrusive? And why *doesn't* proto depend on mpl? These are just the
first three things I checked. :-P
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk