Re: [boost] New boost packaging suggestion for windows

Subject: Re: [boost] New boost packaging suggestion for windows
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-05 09:29:38

Steven Watanabe wrote:
> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:08 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>>>> I'm hoping Troy can give us a public report on the modularization 
>>>> effort.  Troy?
>>
>> I suppose a picture is worth a thousand words:
>>
>>   http://sodium.resophonic.com/boost/boost-dependencies.jpg
>>
>> Please stop reading now and look at that.  Look for cycles and
>> dependencies that don't seem to make sense.
> 
> I actually don't see /very/ much there that doesn't make sense.

I do. Why does spirit depend on xpressive? Why does xpressive depend on 
intrusive? And why *doesn't* proto depend on mpl? These are just the 
first three things I checked. :-P

-- 
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com