Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-05 07:20:31
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Patrick Horgan <phorgan1_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> -pedantic issues all the warnings required by strict ISO C and ISO C++.
> They are in the standard for a reason...
Tread carefully here. The standards require "diagnostics", not
warnings. And the warnings from gcc -pedantic and other compiler's
equivalent go far beyond anything mandated by the standards.
You probably know that, but it is probably worth mentioning for
readers less familiar with the way the standards are written.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk