Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Patrick Horgan (phorgan1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-04 16:12:50

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I would remove -pedantic, but otherwise, it's a very good idea. Unfortunately,
> recent discussion left me with the impression that few folks care.
-pedantic issues all the warnings required by strict ISO C and ISO C++.
They are in the standard for a reason, and I think it fair to expect
system code that I build my code on to pass it. It's the same parts of
boost that always generate warnings. Other parts are always free of
warnings. Not rocket science to know that some are building better code.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at