Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?

Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Patrick Horgan (phorgan1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-04 16:12:50

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I would remove -pedantic, but otherwise, it's a very good idea. Unfortunately,
> recent discussion left me with the impression that few folks care.
>   
-pedantic issues all the warnings required by strict ISO C and ISO C++.  
They are in the standard for a reason, and I think it fair to expect 
system code that I build my code on to pass it.  It's the same parts of 
boost that always generate warnings.  Other parts are always free of 
warnings.  Not rocket science to know that some are building better code.

Patrick