Subject: Re: [boost] New boost packaging suggestion for windows
From: troy d. straszheim (troy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-05 10:47:30
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:08 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> I'm hoping Troy can give us a public report on the modularization
>>>>> effort. Troy?
>>> I suppose a picture is worth a thousand words:
>>> Please stop reading now and look at that. Look for cycles and
>>> dependencies that don't seem to make sense.
>> I actually don't see /very/ much there that doesn't make sense.
> I do. Why does spirit depend on xpressive? Why does xpressive depend on
> intrusive? And why *doesn't* proto depend on mpl? These are just the
> first three things I checked. :-P
I removed the modularization targets from cmake a while ago as they were
causing confusion, trashing people's source directories, and I'd given
up on solving this problem alone. You may see bugs. So use wave to
write a program that generates this graph directly from the header files
instead of from handcoded module.cmake files.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk