Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-06 08:13:34
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Paul A. Bristow
> No new stuff should be accepted until it passes warning free, for a start.
I don't think that'd be fair, at least not for both gcc and visual
c++. Some of the onus to fix a compiler's warnings should be on the
people who care about that compiler.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk