Re: [boost] Ressurecting BCCL (was GGL review)

Subject: Re: [boost] Ressurecting BCCL (was GGL review)
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-08 10:49:23

Hi,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "joel" <joel.falcou_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 4:06 PM
Subject: [boost] Ressurecting BCCL (was GGL review)

> 
> vicente.botet wrote:
>> If there is a clear justification that SFINAE and BCCL do not matches, his should be added in the rationale. But don't we use SFINAE to support concepts? I don't see the need to combine them. Remember that there was a Concept Traits library that was intendedd to replace the BCCL. The library was abandoned because C++0x should include concepts and because some concepts couldn't be managed by traits. Maybe this library should be relaunched as Concepts are not part of C++0x now.
>>   
> I'm really fond of this idea. What's the current status of the Concept 
> Traits library tough and where are the source file located ?

You can as always see the LibrariesUnderConstruction wiki page. I try to maintain here all the libraries related to Boost.

https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/LibrariesUnderConstruction#Boost.ConceptTraits

Best,
Vicente