Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-08 16:01:05
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> On 07/11/2009 10:38, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>>>>>> Stephan Lavavej from Microsoft told me that that this option triggers
>>>>>> known bugs in the compiler. He strongly recommends to stay away from it.
>>>> Why would he do that for his own company's compiler?
>> Yes, however, does really Stephan recommends it?
>> That would be the first question.
> What, you don't believe me when I tell you that STL personally told me that? :)
It's not about that I believe or not.
I simply would expect something posted to the public about that
and officially by Visual C++ Team.
The Visual C++ is not a toy maintained by one-man shop,
so I'm not that eager to take every gossip as truth about this product.
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk