Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-10 16:20:16
Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Jeffrey Bosboom wrote:
>> But wouldn't that also cause the standard library and other actual
>> system headers to generate warnings? It would presumably be
>> difficult to pick out the Boost warnings from the standard library
>> ones, just as Boost users currently complain about picking out
>> warnings from their code amidst Boost warnings.
> That's a great point. Really, I would not use that pragma at all. I
> would make the header not generate errors, or silence individual ones.
I don't know of any way to locally silence individual warnings on gcc.
For Boost, making the suppression local is more important than only
suppressing a specific warning.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk