Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?

Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-10 16:20:16

AMDG

Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Jeffrey Bosboom wrote:
>> But wouldn't that also cause the standard library and other actual 
>> system headers to generate warnings?  It would presumably be 
>> difficult to pick out the Boost warnings from the standard library 
>> ones, just as Boost users currently complain about picking out 
>> warnings from their code amidst Boost warnings.
> That's a great point.  Really, I would not use that pragma at all.  I 
> would make the header not generate errors, or silence individual ones.

I don't know of any way to locally silence individual warnings on gcc.
For Boost, making the suppression local is more important than only
suppressing a specific warning.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe