Re: [boost] [1.41.0] Still confused by regression testing "release" branch summary and unresolved issues

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.41.0] Still confused by regression testing "release" branch summary and unresolved issues
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-10 17:31:23

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Richard Webb
<richard.webb_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Phil Richards <news <at> derived-software.ltd.uk> writes:
>
>>
>> It certainly looks out of date with regards the release note for 1.41.0.
>>
>> It looks to me as if all the compilers listed on the current
>> summary.html for the release are "primary platforms", and I don't
>> understand, therefore, why they aren't all highlighted in bold, and why
>> they don't appear on the "unresolved issues" page.
>>
>
> The explicit-failures-markup.xml on the release branch lists the following
> compilers as 'required' :
>
> acc
> darwin-4.0.1
> gcc-4.1.2_sunos_i86pc
> gcc-4.1.3_linux
> gcc-4.2.1
> gcc-4.2.1_hpux_ia64
> gcc-4.2.1_linux_x86_64
> intel-linux-9.0
> intel-vc8-win-10.0
> intel-win-10.0
> msvc-7.1
> msvc-8.0
> msvc-8.0_64
>
> Which is a bit out of step with the compilers that are actually being tested on
> that branch. Looks like it would be usefull to reconsider this list.

Agreed. I'll update it.

--Beman