Subject: Re: [boost] [1.41.0] Still confused by regression testing "release" branch summary and unresolved issues
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-10 17:31:23
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Richard Webb
> Phil Richards <news <at> derived-software.ltd.uk> writes:
>> It certainly looks out of date with regards the release note for 1.41.0.
>> It looks to me as if all the compilers listed on the current
>> summary.html for the release are "primary platforms", and I don't
>> understand, therefore, why they aren't all highlighted in bold, and why
>> they don't appear on the "unresolved issues" page.
> The explicit-failures-markup.xml on the release branch lists the following
> compilers as 'required' :
> Which is a bit out of step with the compilers that are actually being tested on
> that branch. Looks like it would be usefull to reconsider this list.
Agreed. I'll update it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk