Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [iostreams] Is anyone maintaining Boost.IOStreams?
From: Richard Smith (richard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-11 18:53:03

Bjørn Roald wrote:

>> 3010 -- appears to have been fixed
> I wrote this ticket. It is not resolved.

Apologies. You're quite right.

> The ticket is against a change in trunk that is not merged
> to release.

It has been now -- the version without the include guard
looks like it will be in 1.41.0. (In fact, everything in
trunk has recently been merged to release.)

> A more important question is if all the other trunk
> changes make sense to merge by anybody just on regression
> test results. What is the rationale for then,

Many of the changes are purely cosmetic -- for example,
changing various private typedefs from policy_type to
something more descriptive, or reordering members into
a more logical order.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at