Subject: Re: [boost] [iostreams] Is anyone maintaining Boost.IOStreams?
From: Richard Smith (richard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-11 18:53:03
Bjørn Roald wrote:
>> 3010 -- appears to have been fixed
> I wrote this ticket. It is not resolved.
Apologies. You're quite right.
> The ticket is against a change in trunk that is not merged
> to release.
It has been now -- the version without the include guard
looks like it will be in 1.41.0. (In fact, everything in
trunk has recently been merged to release.)
> A more important question is if all the other trunk
> changes make sense to merge by anybody just on regression
> test results. What is the rationale for then,
Many of the changes are purely cosmetic -- for example,
changing various private typedefs from policy_type to
something more descriptive, or reordering members into
a more logical order.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk