Subject: Re: [boost] [GGL] Some bits missing from Doxygen docs?
From: Jonathan Franklin (franklin.jonathan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-15 17:38:07
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Barend Gehrels <barend_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> This is also what I see. However, looking at the class definition
>> reveals an empty class (other than what may be inherited from V):
> Sure, it is empty. I agree that the documentation is looking strange then,
> but this is how it is implemented.
Yeah, I was just pointing out that the page in question is empty
because the class in question happens to be empty. This is just an
artifact of doxygenation.
Thanks for the clarification.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk