Subject: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamboostorgtrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-16 17:38:54
According to the schedule, John Torjo's Log2 library will be reviewed soon
(currently 3rd in the queue). There's another logging proposal by Andrey
Semashev (currently 13th in the queue).
It seems to me that these proposals are sufficiently close in functionality
that only one of them should be accepted into Boost.
Therefore, wouldn't it make sense to review both libraries in one (longer)
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk